{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1378574,
        "msgid": "a-question-of-relevance-1447893297",
        "date": "1998-06-24 00:00:00",
        "title": "A question of relevance",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "A question of relevance Now, there's an interesting question in your June 20 editorial: Is Golkar still relevant, given its past blemished record? Taking relevance in its broadest sense -- i.e. having a bearing on, or being pertinent to, the present situation -- it is difficult to see how Golkar could be, well, irrelevant. Until the party disbands, it remains relevant.",
        "content": "<p>A question of relevance<\/p>\n<p>Now, there's an interesting question in your June 20<br>\neditorial: Is Golkar still relevant, given its past blemished<br>\nrecord? Taking relevance in its broadest sense -- i.e. having a<br>\nbearing on, or being pertinent to, the present situation -- it is<br>\ndifficult to see how Golkar could be, well, irrelevant. Until the<br>\nparty disbands, it remains relevant. But over the past two<br>\nmonths, gallons of ink have been spent and airwaves kept rocking<br>\nwith the thunder of calls for a session of the House of<br>\nRepresentatives\/People's Consultative Assembly (DPR\/MPR), be it<br>\nplenary, extraordinary or both. So with Golkar as the ruling<br>\nparty still, let's look at a few things and see whether it is<br>\nrelevant or, better still, should be made irrelevant. First,<br>\nSoeharto (still Golkar's generalissimo), during his final moments<br>\nas head of state, sidelined DPR\/MPR by appointing the vice<br>\npresident as president. Note also that if a session is held, he<br>\nwould be entitled to be present at it. Second, whole blocks of<br>\ngroups as well as individual members, like so many rats leaving a<br>\nsinking ship, have left both bodies. This means, of course, that<br>\nthey have recanted on the oath they took last year to represent<br>\nthe people. Suppose a session does take place, would the<br>\nMusyawarah Kekeluargaan Gotong Royong (MKGR), which has turned<br>\nits back on Golkar, the party it joined and through which it<br>\ngained seats, still be legally entitled to take part? Third, even<br>\nthe speaker of both the MPR and the DPR, Harmoko, has said that<br>\nhe'd be willing to step down provided it goes through<br>\nconstitutional procedures. And fourth, one of the vice<br>\nchairpersons of Golkar's central executive committee is Mrs. Siti<br>\nHardijanti Rukmana whose name needs no further elaboration.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesia is a country that since its independence has had<br>\nnothing but a top-down system of authority, a system that<br>\ntrivializes the most important component without which there is<br>\nno raison d'etre for any nation: the people.<\/p>\n<p>This renders the existence of institutions such as a<br>\nrepresentative assembly, even a constitution, totally<br>\nunnecessary. Of course, the reform movement endeavors to change<br>\nall this, but for the moment this top-down condition remains<br>\nunchanged. Hence one must expect that one day, sooner or later,<br>\nthere will again be a bunch of people garbed in yellow, green and<br>\nred jackets parading about in the legislature. The only<br>\nsuggestion I would venture is that they keep those jackets<br>\ntightly buttoned if only to reduce the stench of decay in the<br>\nchambers.<\/p>\n<p>GUS KAIRUPAN<\/p>\n<p>Jakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/a-question-of-relevance-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}