{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1167365,
        "msgid": "a-constitutional-problem-1447893297",
        "date": "2005-08-12 00:00:00",
        "title": "A constitutional problem",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "A constitutional problem I read your article on the Dutch reluctance to recognize Aug. 17, 1945, as Indonesia's first day of independence with great interest (The Jakarta Post, Aug. 8, Dutch treat: Who pays for the pain?). Like many other Dutch citizens, I fully appreciate that for Indonesians, independence really started on that day, with the proclamation of independence.",
        "content": "<p>A constitutional problem<\/p>\n<p>I read your article on the Dutch reluctance to recognize Aug.<br>\n17, 1945, as Indonesia's first day of independence with great<br>\ninterest (The Jakarta Post, Aug. 8, Dutch treat: Who pays for the<br>\npain?).<\/p>\n<p>Like many other Dutch citizens, I fully appreciate that for<br>\nIndonesians, independence really started on that day, with the<br>\nproclamation of independence. I lived in Jakarta in 1995 and I<br>\nhad the Indonesian flag out to celebrate the 50th anniversary of<br>\nthe country's independence with my Indonesian neighbors.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is not that the Dutch are ignorant, foolish or<br>\nstubborn. The problem is constitutional. If the Dutch government<br>\nrecognizes Aug. 17, 1945, now, it would effectively rewrite<br>\nhistory and deny the fact that until the handing over of<br>\nsovereignty, the constitution of the Dutch Empire included the<br>\nDutch East Indies, as Indonesia was then called. It would also<br>\nacknowledge that the war of independence was a war between<br>\nindependent countries, with an aim to destroy the independence of<br>\nIndonesia.<\/p>\n<p>This would amount to aggression (Indonesia sees it that way,<br>\nhence the Indonesian names for what the Dutch call the<br>\nPolitionele Acties, i.e. Agresi I and Agresi II). I think<br>\nthat as much as the Dutch would now like to agree with Indonesia,<br>\nthey simply cannot do so on legal, constitutional grounds.<\/p>\n<p>Hence the visit by Queen Beatrix a few days after the 50th<br>\nanniversary (it was meant to show a willingness to share the<br>\nIndonesian celebration of freedom, rather than to rub it in that<br>\nthe government disagreed on the date. I was present at a<br>\nreception by the queen at the residence of the ambassador, and I<br>\nremember very well that she congratulated the Indonesians present<br>\non their Independence Day) and now by Bot.<\/p>\n<p>It's all a matter of formalities, with no implication for the<br>\nattitude of the Dutch people toward Indonesian independence. What<br>\nmatters is that no Dutchman or woman disputes Indonesian<br>\nindependence. My mother lost a brother (my uncle Jan) in 1949.<br>\nHis grave near Cimahi is very well tended to by Indonesians and I<br>\ngo there occasionally to pay my respects, sad that a futile war<br>\n(futile as far as the Dutch were concerned) had to be fought<br>\nbefore your beautiful country was left alone by an outdated<br>\nsystem of colonialism.<\/p>\n<p>May the 60th anniversary of independence be a great success!<\/p>\n<p>ANTOINE A.H. WONDERS, Surrey, UK<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/a-constitutional-problem-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}