{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1352522,
        "msgid": "21-st-century-crusade-to-reduce-world-poverty-1447893297",
        "date": "2003-10-17 00:00:00",
        "title": "21 st-century crusade to reduce world poverty",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "21 st-century crusade to reduce world poverty Yanuar Nugroho, Director, The Business Watch Indonesia, Surakarta, Central Java, yanuar-n@unisosdem.org In spite of the development of agriculture, scientific knowledge and modern technology, the wealth of the poorest group has actually fallen.",
        "content": "<p>21 st-century crusade to reduce world poverty<\/p>\n<p>Yanuar Nugroho, Director, The Business Watch Indonesia,<br>\nSurakarta, Central Java, yanuar-n@unisosdem.org<\/p>\n<p>In spite of the development of agriculture, scientific<br>\nknowledge and modern technology, the wealth of the poorest group<br>\nhas actually fallen. The United Nations Development Program<br>\n(UNDP) this year reports that more than 1.2 billion people across<br>\nthe world -- two-thirds of them women -- live in crushing<br>\npoverty, and face difficult access to food, safe water,<br>\nsanitation, basic education and health services.<\/p>\n<p>The wealth of the 225 richest countries has nearly tripled in<br>\nthe last six years and their assets now equal the entire annual<br>\nincome of half the world&apos;s population.<\/p>\n<p>Every Oct. 17, a day after World Food Day, the world marks the<br>\nInternational Day for the Eradication of Poverty, to boost the<br>\ndrive to achieve the key goals adopted by world leaders at the<br>\nMillennium Summit in 2000: to halve the number of the world&apos;s<br>\nextremely poor people, provide elementary school education for<br>\nevery child and halt the AIDS epidemic by 2015.<\/p>\n<p>The global record shows that barely half that amount of<br>\nprogress had been achieved; UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said,<br>\n&quot;overall, the world is not on track to meet the goals by 2015.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>There is obviously a tremendous overlap between the 800<br>\nmillion people who live in a state of permanent food insecurity<br>\nand the 1.2 billion people on less than US$1 a day as UNDP<br>\nreported above.<\/p>\n<p>We are constantly told of the one recipe to reduce poverty:<br>\neconomic growth. Yet the UN Human Poverty Index 1998 for<br>\nindustrial countries showed that Sweden, with one of the lowest<br>\nrates of economic growth per person, had the best human welfare.<br>\nWhereas the U.S., with the highest rate of economic growth (and a<br>\nhigher per capita GDP than Sweden), had more people who were<br>\n&quot;functionally illiterate&quot; (20.7 percent) than that in any other<br>\ncountry; the highest proportion of population below the income<br>\npoverty line (19.1 percent) and the greatest number of people who<br>\ndid not expect to reach 60 years of age (13 percent).<\/p>\n<p>Thus, there has been no magic formulae to eradicate poverty.<br>\nBut there are five structural points to be addressed here: (1)<br>\nhuman development and the environment, (2) economic management,<br>\n(3) democratic institutions, (4) empowering the poor to change<br>\ntheir own lives and, (5) a need for global advocacy.<\/p>\n<p>First, investment in education and other essential services.<br>\nThe UN found that there is no lever more significant in reducing<br>\npoverty than investment in education in addition to basic<br>\nservices. Governments in poor countries need to commit themselves<br>\nto universal free primary education and affordable\/accessible<br>\nbasic services provision.<\/p>\n<p>Second, sound management of the economy. For years the<br>\ndevelopment of poor countries was held back by lots of well<br>\nintentioned efforts by governments to spend more money; by<br>\nputting money into inefficient state enterprises that did not<br>\nwork; into funds for defense forces beyond their needs; and<br>\ntaking money away from essential public services.<\/p>\n<p>Sound management would ensure that public spending does not<br>\nrun ahead of the tax base and the revenue available to a country<br>\nand, second, making sure that the priority for the public<br>\nspending is education, health care and basic services.<\/p>\n<p>Third, democratic institutions. Sound democratic institutions<br>\nat the national and village level should reflect people&apos;s<br>\npriorities and their visions for the country, are critical to<br>\nsuccessful development. Without that we can still invest in<br>\neducation, we can still manage our economy quite well, but we<br>\nwill also still flounder, as we see in other regimes and<br>\ncountries without a sound democracy.<\/p>\n<p>Fourth, empowerment of the poor, which is much more crucial<br>\nthan charity. Micro credit may be one such tool. The poor are a<br>\nbetter credit risk than all of us. They are much more sensible<br>\nabout repaying their loans because they recognize that without<br>\nthe kind of assets against which they can borrow from normal<br>\ncommercial means, they have to protect their new credit status<br>\nvery carefully and not betray themselves or their communities by<br>\nnot repaying.<\/p>\n<p>It is an incredibly powerful tool for bringing wealth to the<br>\nlowest levels of a country, although modern financial systems<br>\n(like banking) are not so willing to channel the money to empower<br>\nthe poor. In a poor country like Indonesia, for example, less<br>\nthan 10 percent of credit from banks are given to the poor.<\/p>\n<p>Fifth, global advocacy. Ensuring that the case of the world&apos;s<br>\npoor is not lost on the international community is easy as we are<br>\nall on the same leaky ship. The rich will also sink, slowly or<br>\nquickly unless we end world poverty.<\/p>\n<p>But it will not happen if the global economic system is<br>\nstructured in such a way that it increases the gap between the<br>\nrich and poor.<\/p>\n<p>According to the World Bank (2001), in 1960 gross domestic<br>\nproduct in the richest 20 countries was 18 times that in the<br>\npoorest countries. By 1995, this gap had widened to 37 times.<br>\nAbout 12 economies in Asia and Latin America account for 70<br>\npercent of exports from the developing world absorb almost 80<br>\npercent of investment flows to the developing world and receive<br>\nmore than 90 percent of portfolio investment flows to the<br>\ndeveloping world.<\/p>\n<p>However, Sub Saharan Africa, West, Central and South Asia and<br>\nmany economies in Latin America, Asia and the Pacific have been<br>\nleft out of the global economy and not favored by international<br>\ninvestors. Clearly, free trade centered distribution of benefits<br>\nand costs are unequal.<\/p>\n<p>Whether or not we succeed in this ambitious goal of ending<br>\nworld poverty, the answer rests finally with all of us. It is our<br>\nworld, so may we make it a safe, prosperous and peaceful place.<\/p>\n<p>The writer also lectures at the Sahid University in Surakarta<br>\nand is a researcher at Uni Sosial Demokrat, Jakarta.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/21-st-century-crusade-to-reduce-world-poverty-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}